About this Author
NICK Nick Schulz is the Editor of Tech Central Station and has worked in media circles and the ideas industry as a writer, editor, television producer and policy analyst. His writings have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, Slate, The National Post of Canada, The Baltimore Sun, Investor's Business Daily, The Washington Times, National Review, Reason, Policy Review, and several other publications. He is also, it should be said, a rabid sports fan whose fandom is inversely proportional to his overall athletic ability.
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Transition Game

« Preventive Defense | Main | Picking Up the Technology Spare »

January 07, 2005

Foul Play or Fooled By Randomness?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Slate has an absolutely brilliant piece about using neuroscience to freak out opposing player free-throw shooters.

Last week, I wrote to the NBA owner I deemed most likely to consider applying the scientific method to free-throw shooting, Mark Cuban of the Dallas Mavericks. I told Cuban that the assumption that waving balloons wildly will produce the biggest distraction is just plain wrong. Given how the brain perceives motion, randomly moving balloons aren't very off-putting. When you see a lot of little objects moving crazily back and forth, all the different motion signals that get sent to the brain cancel each other out. In the mind of a free-throw shooter, a crowd of people waving wiggle sticks looks like a snowy TV screen. This sort of white noise might make it harder to see the rim, but the stats show that isn't a big deal for the pros.

But what if the waving balloons didn't cancel each other out? If fans behind the backboard waved their balloons from side to side in unison, opposing players would perceive a field of background motion. When we see a moving background, we tend to assume that we're the ones moving and that the background is staying put. If everything on my desk suddenly drifted to the right, I would probably assume that my chair had rolled to the left. And if I were at the free-throw line as the world drifted to the right, my shooting motion would automatically compensate for what I perceived to be my own motion to the left. David Whitney, a visual psychophysicist at the University of California-Irvine, recently described this phenomenon in the lab. The results, published in Nature ("The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object"), showed that a field of background motion can bias hand movements in the direction of that motion.

Did it work? Read the whole thing to find out.

Comments (2) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Basketball


1. Zack on January 7, 2005 01:11 PM writes...

Nice catch....

Permalink to Comment

2. Mark on February 5, 2005 09:48 PM writes...

I remember when Shaq first got into the NBA he had to be coached in order to improve his free throwing. The guy who was coaching him had been a car salesman or something before getting into coaching free throwing to pros. The ball needs to be rolled from the back of the hand. Shaq O'Neal actually ended up becoming a fairly decent free thrower.

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:


Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

Pushing the Limit
Bad Innovations
A Good Walk Indoors?
The Flux Capacitor It Ain't
The Crippling Effect of Drugs?
Stealers Win
Play Time
Pebble Beach, Anyone?