Corante

About this Author
NICK Nick Schulz is the Editor of Tech Central Station and has worked in media circles and the ideas industry as a writer, editor, television producer and policy analyst. His writings have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, Slate, The National Post of Canada, The Baltimore Sun, Investor's Business Daily, The Washington Times, National Review, Reason, Policy Review, and several other publications. He is also, it should be said, a rabid sports fan whose fandom is inversely proportional to his overall athletic ability.
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Transition Game

« Bronx Billboards: The Substance of Stylish Advertising | Main | He's Going the Distance: Tiger Tales »

April 15, 2004

Socratic Dialogue: The Essence of the Game

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Lots of folks think baseball is riveting, thrilling, stimulating and a challenge to watch and enjoy. Others find it too slow, too dull, too low-impact, too... zzzzzzz. Forgive me, I nodded off at how boring this debate has become.

But a new technology from Sharp will wade right into the middle of this debate and raises a host of philosophical questions as well:

Called "High Impact Sports" the new commercial technologies came from a Sharp researcher who developed technology to summarize video content.

"If you watch a baseball game it will last three hours and sometimes more," said Jon Clemens, the lead executive at the new Sharp venture. "If you run it through our system, it automatically takes out things that aren't baseball and it ends up lasting only 45 minutes."

Algorithms created by the labs and events defined by the licensee allow the system to recognize what is baseball and what is not.

"What it leaves in is baseball -- a stolen base, a pop up, a pitch," said Clemens. "It goes through and finds them all. What you see is the windup, pitch, strike, windup, pitch, strike.

"Some people can't watch a three hour game. They are working. They want to see every play, but they don't have three hours," he said.

In today's fast paced world, this technology brings speed to even a relaxing slow-paced game like baseball.

What's most interesting here is the Clemens remark that "What it leaves in is baseball." This prompts you to ask: "what is baseball?" (indulge me here peoiple; I studied philosophy so these are hugely important questions). Baseball critics dislike the spitting, scratching, foot shifting and just plain old standing around that players do. But baseball fans say, look deeper and you'll see a lot more going on away from the ball.

For example, will the Sharp technology capture what used to be called the "Williams shift" after Teddy Ballgame but what I call the "neocon shift" -- when the left side of the infield shifts significantly to the right to combat a lefty slugging threat (as teams do today against Jason Giambi, for example)? Baseball fans know that's as important a part of the game as anything else, even if it's not, as Clemens put it, a "stolen base, a pop up, a pitch... the windup, pitch, strike, windup, pitch, strike."

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: TV/Video/Film


TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/external.cgi/3826


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Pushing the Limit
Bad Innovations
A Good Walk Indoors?
The Flux Capacitor It Ain't
The Crippling Effect of Drugs?
Stealers Win
Play Time
Pebble Beach, Anyone?