Corante

Transition Game

Monthly Archives

March 30, 2004

A Good Walk Spoiled... by Not Walking

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Mark Twain described golfing as a good walk spoiled. But what if you can simulate a round of golf without walking at all? Wired reports on new golf simulators:

Computers still haven't cleared mathematician Alan Turing's test of true artificial intelligence - being able to pass for human in typed conversation. But they've aced a kind of Turing test for at least one sport: simulating a game so well that playing a digital version improves real-life skills.

That game is golf, because many of its elements can be re-created so well by computers. Muscular movement plays an important role but, unlike in football or basketball, not a dominant one. Golf depends more on a certain skill for visualization - the great players have a knack for seeing shots before hitting them - which translates well to a screen.

...These days, getting the ultimate virtual golf experience takes about $50,000, a 13- by 20-foot area dedicated to a freestanding machine like the Full Swing Simulator, and, for many, an exceptionally understanding spouse. Made by a San Diego-based company called Full Swing Golf, the simulator projects a customized version of Links on a nylon screen, into which you can hit actual golf balls using actual golf clubs. After the ball hits the screen, the simulator creates a video image that continues its trajectory. The ball's path is measured by sensors in the floor and walls that take three readings of the ball's position - two as it flies off your clubhead and a third when it hits the screen. The last allows the machine to track spin.


Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Golf

March 29, 2004

The First Shall Be Last...

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

New statistical research shows that batting first doesn't help in cricket.

Sports statistician Professor Stephen Clarke, in collaboration with research student Paul Allsopp at the Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, have observed that conventional wisdom of batting first helps cough up a huge total, is a general myth.

"In test cricket there's a general feeling that if you win the toss you should bat. But when you look at the past record, it shows that both home and away teams do better when they bat second than when they bat first," Clarke said.

You're finding more of this kind of thing in sports. For example recent research shows it makes far more sense to go for it on fourth down and short yardage in pro football (American football). Whether coaches will take this research to heart is another matter. My hunch is, over time, they will.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Cricket

Always On World Almost Always On

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Iron Man athlete added to Companion Worlds board.

Companion will launch its services in late summer 2004 with certified video exercises instructions, workout programs, meal/nutrition plans, golf instructions and more.

... Companion Worlds, Inc. provides an end-to-end solution that enables rich instructional video and media content on the Internet to become mobile. Internet Portal services that provide fitness instruction, golf tips, weight & nutrition management become more valuable if readily available where and when consumers do their activity. Companion's service, marketed under the Progio(TM) brand name, includes its patent pending ProXM(TM) network and Progio(TM) handheld device (the world's first "Sports PDA").

If the "performance-apparel" market is already a multi-billion dollar sector, I have to think there's a huge potential market for these kinds of goods and software products.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Misc.

Believe -- and Don't Believe -- the Hype: the Technification of Sport

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Brother Britton has a post on Michael Lewis' "Moneyball" chock full of linky goodness.

Of course, not everyone is thrilled about the trend. But so what? “While old-fashioned trainers may lament this technification of sport, a new generation of sports theorists, who range from economists publishing in refereed journals to fans of an analytical bent sharing their views via the web, see a beauty in their rigour,” the article states. The trend has even given rise to several scientific journals such as the Journal of Sports Economics and the International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport.

Read the whole thing. I'd only stop to point out that while this "technification of sport" (great turn of phrase) is going to upset the old guard, the old-boy network doesn't have as much to lose as it probably fears (provided they learn how to use a laptop). Why? To understand, think of how often in a week you'll read an article about a new study that demonstrates nothing more than the perfectly obvious: "Human pedestrians more likely than birds to be hit by automobiles"; "Water has many health benefits and makes you pee." The point is we "know" a lot of things without having the data to back it up.

This transformation is a "marginal revolution"; this is not to suggest it isn't significant. In many ways, the most significant developments are always those that happen at the margins (a fact lost on most cultural/political elites). I'm as excited by the geek revolution in sports as the next guy (for more see "Money Is the Root of All Good") but a little perspective is in order. The best and most lasting revolutions are usually cumulative in nature. The sabermetrics revolution is that kind. In other words, Bill James is Julian Simon or Ben Graham, not Robespierre.

Comments (17) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Stats

Fatty Fatty Two by Four, Can't Get through the Schoolhouse Door

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

New study from the journal Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise on fat kids:

If parents need any more confirmation that the problem isn't so much lazy kids but the many ways American culture discourages movement, have a look at a recent study. Children ages 6-12 in three countries were given pedometers to wear. Swedish boys took as many as 18,346 steps a day, Australians 15,023 and Americans 13,872. The Americans led in weight.

The study was published recently in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, the journal of the American College of Sports Medicine. The researchers point to cultural differences among the countries studied. For example, the study said, Swedish walking paths make it easy for kids to travel on foot.

"Walking paths"?

Now, I know I'm going to sound like a hopeless reactionary here, but I remember not that long ago when I was a little kid, it was assumed -- if not required -- that you would play three sports a year for your school. I know there are still some schools, including high schools, that do this (they are watering the requirements down some, including "sports" like archery in the mix, but at least it requires movement). Anyway, this ain't rocket science (which my uncle the engineer points out isn't even close to being the most complicated science, but that's beside the point...). Why don't we just force kids to exercise more by forcing them to play competitive sports? I know private schools still do this. Can public schools? If not, why not?

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

Stretching the Truth

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Here's a classic example of a study the media will distort beyond all utility.

Stretching does not live up to its reputation as an injury preventer, a study has found.

"We could not find a benefit," said Stephen Thacker, director of the epidemiology program office at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Athletes who stretch might feel more limber, but they shouldn't count on stretching to keep them healthy, he said.

Then, at the end of the story, we find:

Other research has found that warming up can reduce the risk of injury. Gymnasts and dancers might be exceptions because their activities require great flexibility, so stretching might help them, Thacker said.

There you have it, stretching is both beneficial and not beneficial. Whatever.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Studies

March 26, 2004

Economics of Sports Stadiums

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Read this post from Russ Roberts on new stadiums and how they should be financed.

USA Today reports on a study by University of Dayton economists Marc Poitras and Larry Hadley: privately financed sports stadiums pay for themselves. Tax dollars aren’t necessary to make them viable. Somehow I doubt that the study will slow the pace of publicly financed sports stadiums. While it may make it more embarrassing for franchise owners to ask for public handouts, what’s a little stigma among friends? The success of the begging strategy is mainly due to the threat of exit—owners demand public financing as a way of extracting money from cities fearful that teams will leave. There isn’t free entry into sports leagues—leagues tightly control new entrants—so cities are always vulnerable to the threat of a team leaving.

It's a form legal extortion. And Russ Roberts is right, it will do nothing to slow the pace of publicly financed stadiums. But just remeber this the next time you hear that a taxpayer funded stadium will "pay for itself." There may be reasons to go ahead with it anyway, but "paying for itself" isn't one of them.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Sports and Economics

March 25, 2004

Wax On, Wax Off the Wrinkles

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

A new study says taking up martial arts can keep aging at bay:

Douris' team examined the overall fitness of 18 individuals between 40 and 60 years of age. Nine of the study participants had been practicing soo bahk do, a Korean martial art similar to karate or tae kwon do, for about three years. The other nine participants maintained a more or less "couch potato" lifestyle.

Overall, the soo bahk do devotees "were much more flexible, had more leg strength, less body fat, better aerobic conditioning and better balance" compared to the sedentary study subjects, Douris reports.

The martial art practitioners had an average 12 percent less body fat than the non-exercisers, the researchers report. They also seemed much stronger -- while sedentary types could only muster up 37 sit-ups in a row on average, the soo bahk do practitioners averaged 66 sit-ups before exhaustion set in. The martial arts group also displayed more than double the balancing power of non-exercisers and outperformed the sedentary types when it came to flexibility.

The study did not compare the benefits of the martial arts to that of gym workouts, running or other fitness options. However, Douris estimates that the average soo bahk do class raises students' metabolic level -- a measurement of changes in the metabolic rate -- to about a 10, a level equal to that of jogging.


Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Sports and Health

Theories of Relativity

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

JC has a stimulating post in which he writes that:

Judging player ability over time when player performance is a function of other participants in the game is not easy. For example, in sports such as running, where the outcome is measured by time, it is very easy to compare athletes over time using absolute measures of performance. The runner with the fastest time is clearly the best. However, sports such as baseball, where outcomes are a function of the relative performance of players, comparing abilities becomes much more difficult. While Babe Ruth was the greatest hitter of his era it does not mean that he is any better than the players in today's game. The pitchers of today differ from the pitchers of Ruth's era. While Ruth may have dominated in his own time, few would argue that this beer-swilling slugger would be the same player in today's game. But, it is possible that Ruth performed better against his competition than Barry Bonds does to his.

As they say in the blogosphere: Cliche the whole thing.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

"Uber" Uber Alles

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Great post (hat tip Eric at Off-Wing) on Uber-gamers at ESPN including info about a guy who designs the robot positioning systems for Mars Rover landers.

...To hear him describe it - he had to create a system where the lander could know where it was on the surface of Mars without having to look around with a camera, take a day to get info back to Earth, then have scientists plot out how to move which wheel in what direction and by how much and then take a day to send the information back to the Rover for it to do, then send back, etc... so he created a mathematical formula for the robot to have a map of the geopgraphy of Mars in its computer banks at all times and by knowing exactly where it is on that map it knows what it has to do to move around. Fascinating... and he still reports that winning Uber is more challenging ;)"

Uber Uber Alles!

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media

A Stat of Ruthian Proportions

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

The gang at Football Outsiders has developed a cool new stat, called the Leader Ratio:

Leader ratio is simple: If a player leads the league in a statistic (we'll use rushing yards for the purposes of this article), you divide his total yards by the total yards of the player who came in second. In 1958, when Jim Brown led the league with 1,527 yards, the second-best rusher was Alan Ameche with 791 yards. So that gives Brown a leader ratio of 1.93, which happens to be the best in the history of pro football.

I love stuff like this. There are limitations to this kind of statistic (is a back playing for a run-oriented offense? does he play with a great QB who spreads defenses? etc.) but as these things go this is pretty useful in determining how a back should rank against the rest of the league in a given year.

Switching to baseball for a sec, it's stats like this that lead me to conclude that Babe Ruth was far and away the greatest baseball player of all time, and no argument can be made that he wasn't. There are some years in Ruth's career when he hit more homeruns than any other TEAM!! Stats like that go a long way to helping demonstrate player greatness over time.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Stats

The Business of Olympic Pools

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Swimsuits are becoming big business, and not the Sports Illustrated teeny bikini issue kind:

Speedo's Fastskin II and Tyr's Aqua Shift, billed by their respective companies as the "world's fastest swimsuit," both claim to improve finish times by decreasing "drag," the resistance that slows a body's movement through water. The companies spent millions of dollars over the past four years developing the suits and plan to incorporate the technology into more affordable, everyday suits. Speedo expects to apply the technology to skiing-, cycling- and activewear — part of the $41 billion performance-apparel market.

That the "performance-apparel market" is a $40 billion plus industry is stunning. And here's a piece on the use of bumps on swim skins to enhance performance.

Tyr claims that its patent-pending suit will trim more than twice as much off a swimmer's race time as the Speedo suit.

Swimmers generally try to reduce frictional drag by shaving the hair off their body or by donning ultrasmooth suits. Because water is so dense, swimmers expend more than 90 percent of their energy just trying to overcome fluid resistance. Thus, the more they can reduce drag, the more efficient swimmers can be.

According to David Pendergast, a research physiologist at the University of Buffalo and one of the inventors of the Tyr suit, the approach is, at least on the surface, counterintuitive: that a swimmer's time can be improved by increasing rather than decreasing friction. This friction comes in the form of fabric piping that forms strategically placed ridges on various parts of the suit.

"Most swimsuits have tried to reduce frictional drag," Professor Pendergast said. "But with this suit we took a completely different approach."

It is a new approach for swimsuits but not for skiing: In 1994, Spyder skiwear founder Dave Jacobs designed a downhill skiing suit with similar raised piping. The ski suit was banned before the 1998 Nagano Olympics because it was perceived to give an unfair advantage. By contrast, the Tyr suit has been approved for swimming competition by the International Swimming Federation.

More than 35 years after James Counsilman - who is known as Doc and was the coach of Mark Spitz, who won seven gold medals in the 1972 Olympics - proposed a revolutionary theory in his book "The Science of Swimming," there is still no strong consensus on the physics of swimming.

My hunch is this Athens Olympics we're going to see a LOT of controversies over the use of various performance enablers and enhancements.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Equipment

March 24, 2004

Stronger, lighter, faster...

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Technology is making in-line skating more popular:

Skate technology has adapted to accommodate the burgeoning interest in fitness. New and returning buyers find skates that are significantly stronger, lighter, faster and cooler than in-line skates were just 10 years ago.

Older, more established sports have a more difficult time harnessing changes in technology to renew popular interest. Golf is one of the exceptions to that rule however.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Equipment

March 22, 2004

Brother can you spare the time?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Microsoft may be getting the crap beat out of it in Europe these days, thanks to Monti and his anti-trust goons (you musn't give people things for free!!), but the software giant is plugging away, developing offerings for customers at an impressive rate for a large fim:

Microsoft aims to score with sports fans with the launch Monday of its first add-on service for so-called smart watches.

The company unveiled its MSN Direct data service in June, delivering news headlines, weather forecasts and other updates to smart watches. The add-on promises to provide MSN Direct subscribers with the latest information on basketball teams in the National Basketball Association (NBA), Women's National Basketball Association (WNBA), and National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I teams.

The content itself will be generated by ESPN, a television and Internet sports network, and will feature information such as scores, statistics, standings and game times, according to Microsoft.

The Redmond, Wash.-based software giant has been pushing hard to establish itself as a software and content vendor in the nascent market for smart watches, devices that look like traditional wristwatches but feature embedded capabilities for receiving data via wireless transmissions.

Convergence, they name is wristwatch? Maybe not, but this takes us further down the road of always on news and info streams, a positive development.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media

Juice Use: Guilty Until Proven Innocent?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Miami Herald's Dan le Batard on Bonds and the question of juice use.

What is happening to Barry Bonds and his brethren isn't fair.

Bonds' bloated face is on the cover of Sports Illustrated with an asterisk superimposed on his forehead, and this serial smearing we're doing feels myopic, bloodthirsty, irresponsible and wrong.

We don't have proof. Wouldn't you like to have some of that? We have a lot of circumstantial evidence we've made admissible in the court of public opinion, but an indictment of Bonds' trainer is not an indictment of Bonds. How does this work? Is everyone who has ever trained with indicted Greg Anderson now guilty by association? That's fair?

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

March 21, 2004

Brady's Bombs

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Did Brady Anderson take steroids when he hit 50 jacks (26 more than he hit in any other season)? Jim Palmer seems to think maybe he did. But here Brady gives a deeper explication of what he thinks happened.

''Because I only hit 50 home runs once, it was, in fact, an aberration. However, it was not a fluke... 'Nothing can be considered a fluke that takes six months to accomplish. Rather it was a culmination of all my athleticism and baseball skills and years of training peaking simultaneously. This was my athletic opus.

''Hitting in front of (Roberto) Alomar, (Rafael) Palmeiro, (Bobby) Bonilla and (Cal) Ripken didn't hurt either.''

''I know what I accomplished, am proud of it, and know that it was done with integrity... I'll state this once again: It was 26 more home runs than I hit in any other season, but that's just one more home run per week, just one more good swing. That is the data that simultaneously comforted me and haunted me, the small difference between greatness and mediocrity.''

UPDATE: JC has more on Brady and Ken Caminiti here.

... if you are one of those people who thinks the Palmer standard is a good one, then you would have to say that if Anderson had some help from steroids, he also had to improve quite a bit on his own. His hitting power grew a lot more than Caminiti's, and we know he was on the juice.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

March 20, 2004

Into the Technological Wilds

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Here's a piece on how hunting and fishing are being changed by technology.

As technology encroaches further into the wilds of fishing and hunting, sportsmen have added personal computers to their arsenal of rods, reels, knives and guns. And they're relying on Web sites to guide them to the hot spots for fish and the best habitats for game.

Among the vendors at the Journal Sentinel Sports Show are OneStopHuntNFish.com, which offers a Web site that serves as a clearinghouse for more than 250 guides throughout the United States; and Lake-Link.com, which has information on more than 20,000 lakes in nine Midwestern states.


Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Hunting/Fishing

March 19, 2004

God Speed

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

As long as people have played competitive contact sports, players have died. It is always unspeakably sad. The recent death of a Cornell lax player is no exception. Prayers are with his family and friends. Not surprisingly it is prompting a debate about equipment and technological efforts to improve safety. Here's hoping sensible changes will prevent this sort of thing in the future.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Equipment

SAFER in the Long Run

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Here's an intriguing story about the effects that a new safety technology is having on NASCAR races.

Through two highly successful years, the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction barrier has built a crash-tested consensus in a sport where agreements are rare.

With 43 drivers, NASCAR often is faced with 43 opinions, but when the subject is SAFER, the reviews have been unanimously and overwhelmingly positive. In its smashing debuts at Indianapolis, Richmond, New Hampshire and Homestead, the "soft-wall" technology allowed many to walk away from mangled cars without a single serious injury.

Despite that, the track at Darlington is, by some accounts, not well-suited for SAFER.

"You don't even need soft walls at Darlington," Mayfield said. "We need to run close to the wall; that's the only place the asphalt is any good, and they've taken it away. It might take some of the excitement out. Darlington is worried about keeping their date, but if the race is not any good, they might be losing their date."

Mayfield and several peers are unhappy about losing a prime piece of racing real estate. The barriers, which consist of steel tubes and foam blocks, will jut 30 inches from the outside wall. Their addition will gobble up asphalt along the quickest path around Darlington.

It's not uncommon for new safety technologies in sports to have perverse long-term incentives. For example, there's no evidence that shoulder pads in football prevent injuries since guys just hit harder than ever. They might not dislocate shoulders, but they pop knees instead. It will be interesting to see if SAFER actually makes races safer in the long run.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:

March 18, 2004

Beware the Blogging Cuban

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Dallas Mavs owner and Broadcast.com founder Mark Cuban has a blog, in part to respond to media criticism (Hat tip: OffWing). Huh. Not sure what to make of this.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Media

Playing by the Same Rules?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

OBM points to an interesting piece by Malcolm "Tipping Point" Gladwell on performance enhancers/enablers in sports. The piece was published the day before 9/11 (yes, that would be 9/10) so maybe no one paid attention to it at the time. Gladwell:

We have come to prefer a world where the distractable take Ritalin, the depressed take Prozac, and the unattractive get cosmetic surgery to a world ruled, arbitrarily, by those fortunate few who were born focussed, happy, and beautiful. Cosmetic surgery is not "earned" beauty, but then natural beauty isn't earned, either. One of the principal contributions of the late twentieth century was the moral deregulation of social competition--the insistence that advantages derived from artificial and extraordinary intervention are no less legitimate than the advantages of nature. All that athletes want, for better or worse, is the chance to play by those same rules.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

Zero Tolerance for Zero Tolerance

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Want further evidence that baseball is getting tough on 'roids? Ken Caminiti has been hired as a coach with the Padres.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

March 17, 2004

It's the Hub, Dude

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Where I'm from, The Hub is a furniture store. But now it's a snowboarding jacket produced by the sporting goods maker O'Neill and a German electronics firm.

"The jacket... comes with functions like mobile telephony and MP3 player. Woven into the jacket are electrically conductive fabric tracks which connect the chip module to a fabric keyboard and built-in speakers in the helmet.

"The chip module contains a full-featured MP3 player and is Bluetooth enabled. The microphone is integrated in the collar of the jacket. The snowboarding jacket wearer can listen to music and also take mobile calls..."

I'm sure the X-games set will be thrilled, but do we really need them to have clothes that will make them even bigger a-holes?

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Clothing/Uniforms

It's in the Game

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Statsology is a cool site looking at "sports data innovations and developments." In this post we find out about a new system that:

will focus three cameras on the tunnel between pitcher and batter, allowing them to three-dimensionally measure the speed, location and trajectory of pitches. (We’ll be able to see whose fastballs really do have late movement, and perhaps whose hits come off the bat hardest.) Each system costs about $40,000. MLB has signed off on the expenditure, and mlb.com is in talks with Seattle stat company Tendu to work together on the real-time processing of the data.

Very cool.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Misc.

Ah, There's the Rub...

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

A company called CardioTech International has just introduced:

BlistRx(TM) a space-age polyurethane self-adhering dressing intended for sports enthusiasts, to prevent blisters, sore spots and calluses. Current products aim at treating blisters after they are formed, but blisters are painful and are frequently debilitating. BlistRx is applied to any problem area where friction occurs between moist skin and tight footwear, golf clubs, tennis rackets, etc to prevent skin injuries, and is removed after physical activity.

It would seem to me this stuff would have to be so non-invasive (is that a word?) that an athlete wouldn't mind using it. Sounds pretty cool, though.

Comments (3) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Equipment

Gene Doping and Beijing 2008

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Interesting piece from Reuters on gene doping and sports:

Genetic doping is unlikely to be an issue at the Athens Olympics in August or the Turin Winter Games in 2006, but it could be a problem come Beijing in 2008.

"It's a realistic problem which we may have to face, but not today," said Dr Bengt Saltin, director of the Centre for Muscle Research at Copenhagen University and a member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) science committee.

"The Beijing Olympics would be the earliest possible occasion."

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Biotech

Aluminum Bats and Bodies

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Eric at Off Wing Opinion -- which is one of the best sports blogs, and don't just take my word for it, Forbes said so -- writes in to say about steroids:

"I think of their effect in baseball to be akin to using an aluminum bat..."

This is a good point. Aluminum bats are banned. Why not ban steroids, too? I'm sympathetic to this argument and I have no real problem with the steroids ban. I just happen to think the only way it's going to work is if the players' union gets serious about it. Enforcement efforts coming from management or league officials will be unlikely to work effectively. It has to start with the players (I've addressed some of the reasons for this here and here).

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Baseball

Only Steroids Matter

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Terrific post at OBM on steroids and really dumb columns written by famous baseball writers.

One thing I've never understood about most major sports writers is you have the potential to generate more interest in what you write if you're iconoclastic and go against the CW. Yet so few major sportswriters want to tackle the steroids controversy in an interesting way. There's a huge missed opportunity here (hats off to Reason magazine for running good pieces on this subject).

UPDATE: Apparently Dear Leader Bud Selig is thinking of invoking the Maoist-sounding "best interests of the game" clause to crack down harder on steroids (hat tip: HBT). That's fine, so far as it goes. The players are the ones who've buttered this whole thing. But when will Bud invoke the clause to get rid of himself, something that would truly be in the "best interests of the game"?

MORE UPDATES: Eric at Off-Wing Opinion draws my attention to the Miami Herald's Dan le Batard who has helped sports fans think more clearly about the steroids issues. Here's a good example. He interviews the bioethicist Norm Fost. In an earlier life when I was a TV producer I put together a show on stem cell research and Fost was a guest. He's a brilliant guy, knows the science and has thought about bioethical issues longer than anyone who isn't named Leon Kass.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

Sports as Reflections of the Larger Society

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Colby Cosh is one of the most interesting writers around today. Here's a lengthy post that looks at some of the sociological, psychological and biological aspects of sports. (He cites Steve Sailer, a writer with whom I differ on some key issues like immigration. That said, there's no doubt that Sailer's use of data and numbers is admirable, that he takes science seriously and that people, including me, have a lot to learn from his writing.)

I particularly enjoyed Colby's discussion of fighting in hockey:

... I would also ask you to consider that the self-regulating ethos of Canadian-style hockey, the idea that not all disputes are appropriately settled by reference to the authorities, will protect the place of individualistic Americans and Canadians within the game, and especially the former. When two guys fight on the ice they're saying "We're not going to take our problems to the sheriff--we're going to settle them according to a shared, non-legislated code of fair play." (Sometimes, as with the famous Lights Out brawl at the World Juniors, the message of a fight is "the sheriff is an a-hole; we're taking matters into our own hands.") Why is there so little fighting in the European game? Maybe it's presumptuous to say this, but have you noticed that the Europeans are a little weaker in their grasp of the whole "personal responsibility" thing? That their societies (with exceptions) are organized to minimize the importance and the permissibility of self-defence? That when a European player feels molested on the ice (warning: Don Cherry-style generalization), his instinctive response is to take a dive, appealing to the magistrate with elaborate theatrics?

Brilliant stuff.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Hockey

Is Bigger Always Better?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Want evidence that the steroid crackdown is working and the MLB players aren't using juice as much? Well, for starters, in training camp players are reporting that balls are bigger.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

We Can Rebuild Him...

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Dr. Andy Miah has written what looks like will be a fascinating book coming out this year called "Genetically Modified Athletes: Biomedical Ethics, Gene Doping and Sport." I'll have more on this once I can review the book. It has a nice blurb from Francis Fukuyama who says that "our existing framework for dealing with the problem of sports doping is inadequate on both practical and ethical grounds." This is an ongoing theme of this site, so I look forward to getting the book.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Biotech

March 16, 2004

Bill James, Too Abstract

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Here's an interesting interview with Bill James. What struck me most was this comment from James:

"When you're in a position where you HAVE to overspend for a player--you HAVE to pay more for a player than he really is worth--how do you know when to stop? It's a very serious question for every baseball team, and I have a way of deriving an answer. Theo needs an answer, and ownership needs an explanation. Theo doesn't HAVE to buy my answer, and ownership doesn't have to buy my explanation. Theo is free to ignore my calculations; ownership is free to reject my approach. But. . .they need an answer; I have an answer."

What is his answer? The interview doesn't say, but wouldn't the Jamesian answer be you know when to stop when you reach the price the player is worth? If not, why not?

Meanwhile, Dan Drezner discusses why Bill James is not an economist.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Baseball

March 12, 2004

Baseball Is a Metaphor for...

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

I get annoyed at the "baseball-is-a-metaphor-for-life" school of thinking perhaps best expressed by George Will and other enthusiasts. I prefer anti-communist menace Stan Evans' take on baseball, that it's a metaphor for... softball.

Either way, Brother Arnold has a provocative argument about sports and biotech and metaphors:

Like Leon Kass, the Chairman of the Bioethics Council, [Michael] Sandel makes extensive use of sports metaphors. For instance, he writes, "as the role of enhancement increases, our admiration of the achievement fades -- or, rather, our admiration for the achievement shifts from the player to his pharmacist."

However, sports are a peculiar facet of human experience. They are inevitably zero-sum in character. For every winner, there is a loser. Each tournament has only one champion. When an athlete breaks a world record, the previous record-holder's title is eclipsed.

Is the same true of biotech? Is the metaphor legit? I report, you decide.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Biotech

March 09, 2004

"Some Danger, After All, Is Central to Noble Activity"

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

I'm back from a few more days in Florida where the slimmed down and presumably steroid-free Jason Giambi blasted a grand salami in dramatic fashion and the "I'm-so-clean-l'll-pee-in-a-cup" Gary Sheffield is out for two to three months with a jammed finger.

I returned to find the Atlantic Monthly has a long piece from Michael Sandel on performance enhancement. I'll have more on it when I get through it but there are already some intellectual sleights of hand from him that will make it pretty tough to take the conclusions seriously.

More importantly, The New Atlantis has its new issue out with a strong piece from Charles Rubin on "Man or Machine." Interesting outtake:

The possibility of harmful side effects from enhancement technologies will always be worrisome. But the deeper dilemma is not simply the regulatory question of what is “safe” but more fundamental questions about the proper shape of a human life. Some danger, after all, is central to noble activity. The pursuit of excellence in one area of life will inevitably create distortions in others. The question is how far such distortions can go before the quest for excellence becomes destructive of the very humanity of the one undertaking it.

This is the problem with the discussion -- or absence of discussion -- about the steroid controversy today. Most players taking them probably think this way (although they won't admit it in court). Yes, steroids pose some sort of risk, but players feel they take plenty of risks as it is, so steroid use is a question of degree, not kind.

Does someone like, say, Bonds -- assuming he's taken them and we don't know for sure that he has -- think that taking juice is destructive of his very humanity? Presumably not. And were he so inclined he could probably make a strong argument that it isn't. That's not to say it's ultimately a convincing case, but it's certainly debatable.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

March 02, 2004

Bush's Idea

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

On a related note: The Bush decision to go after 'roids in his State of the Union address was his own, according to CNN.

When the President talked about steroids in January's State of the Union speech, they wondered if a team once known for doing big and bold things hadn't become bogged down in narrowcasting. (As it turns out, the idea actually came from Bush, who had noticed, say aides, that some major league players "had their careers resurrected" in ways that pointed to the possibility of steroid use.)

Benito Santiago, this presumably means you.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

True Playa for Real!

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Sports Economist says:

In the current climate, [former players' rep Marvin Miller's] defense of player rights is sure to rub some the wrong way, but as always his position rests on solid ground.

I'm a one-note Johnny on this, but incentives matter. Who has the incentive to make the most sensible decision about performance enablers and enhancers? The players and their union. It's not even close. But it ain't gonna happen in the current climate.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

Word Smiths

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Off Wing Opinion makes a good observation about the denials this time:

...what's different this time, is the tenor of the denials coming from a number of the athletes involved with the accusations:

Sheffield's attorney Paula Canny said, "Gary Sheffield has never knowingly ingested a steroid ... and Gary Sheffield has never knowingly applied an anabolic steroid cream to his body."

Santiago's attorney, David Cornwell, declined specific comment but said: "Based on my involvement in this matter, I know that many of the athletes involved did not know they were being given a banned substance."

Anna Ling, an attorney for Anderson, said the trainer had "never knowingly given any illegal substance to anybody."

It's gonna get ugly.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers

Bail Bonds?

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Obviously the steroids story is going to be with us through Spring training and into this season.

San Francisco Giants slugger Barry Bonds, New York Yankees stars Jason Giambi and Gary Sheffield and three other major league baseball players received steroids from a Burlingame nutritional supplement lab, federal investigators were told.

The baseball stars allegedly got the illegal performance-enhancing drugs from the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative through Greg Anderson, Bonds' personal weight trainer and longtime friend, according to information furnished the government and shared with The Chronicle.

In addition to Bonds, Giambi and Sheffield, the other baseball players said to have received steroids from BALCO via Anderson were two former Giants, outfielder Marvin Benard and catcher Benito Santiago, and a former A's second baseman, Randy Velarde.

At this point it's probably too late to take seriously the idea that maybe we need to rethink the use of performance enhancements/enablements in general, and steroid use in sports in particular -- although for those willing to try, I'd recommend these pieces by Dayn Perry and Patrick Cox, both of whom understand the science and ethics better than your average sports writer.

All I'd add at this point is that the players and the players' union are in the best position to judge for themselves how they should think about steroid use. Having the Feds crack down on it is not probably the best way to address the question.

Also, make sure you see JC's take on Bonds and his homerun binge. Some important perspective.

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Drugs/Performance Enhancers