Corante

About this Author
NICK Nick Schulz is the Editor of Tech Central Station and has worked in media circles and the ideas industry as a writer, editor, television producer and policy analyst. His writings have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, Slate, The National Post of Canada, The Baltimore Sun, Investor's Business Daily, The Washington Times, National Review, Reason, Policy Review, and several other publications. He is also, it should be said, a rabid sports fan whose fandom is inversely proportional to his overall athletic ability.
Check out Jevon MacDonald on the "uncertain future of blogging"

Transition Game

« What's Wrong with Hockey? Bigger Ain't Better | Main | Is This the Perfect Profession or What? The Evolution of Play »

February 10, 2004

From the Desktop to the Ballpark

Email This Entry

Posted by Nick

Corante's Dana Blankenhorn points to this CNet story on Major League Baseball playing hardball with Web portals, trying to get big bucks upfront for broadcast rights.

Dana writes:

Baseball is trying to treat streaming media players, like Real and Microsoft, the way it treats the broadcast networks. Sports leagues have long pushed broadcasters into taking losses on those rights, figuring that they capture key demographics (men 18-34), which they can then push into watching other shows on the same networks.

This is not the way the Internet works. The Internet is not publishing, and it's not broadcasting. The survivors in the Internet business have finally learned this, even those which, like Real, began life expecting it to recapitulate broadcast.

Dana may or may not be right, although I'd argue the Internet certainly IS publishing and to a lesser extent broadcasting in some sense. But either way, baseball has a big opportunity to exploit the web in a way that other sports don't.

It goes without saying that baseball has alienated millions of fans in myriad ways, but I'd argue a chief source of alienation is how few day games there are these days, particularly during the playoffs and World Series. Trying to build a fan base without being mindful of the time of day when kids want to and are able to watch is foolish. But as baseball has catered to TV for big bucks, it has made it difficult for younger fans to connect to the sport.

Because there are so many baseball games in a year, a robust offering of games online -- particularly if fans don't have to pay subscriptions to see their teams -- especially during the early to mid-afternoon when lots of workers and kids are at their computers could prove a big draw for baseball (for football, this isn't really an option).

Dana says he wouldn't watch a game on a small screen. But having a relatively unobtrusive window open in the corner of your screen while you work or while a kid does his homework would prove attractive to a lot of people.

Baseball should think of this not as a way to make bank up front, but as a way to connect with fans in a way that other sports can't. I'm not counting on the Selig braintrust to think of it that way, which is too bad -- for baseball and for fans.

Comments (1) + TrackBacks (0) | Category: Baseball


COMMENTS

1. John Gibson on February 10, 2004 03:42 PM writes...

Although they charge for it, MLB already has a product that lets you watch a game from your computer. It's a 350k stream.

http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/video/mlb_tv.jsp

I think what they are doing is either make money off of the other portals by charging rights fees or better yet if they balk, getting those eyeballs over to www.mlb.com where they offer everything that the web portals do.

Permalink to Comment

TrackBack URL:
http://www.corante.com/cgi-bin/mt/external.cgi/3767


EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
Pushing the Limit
Bad Innovations
A Good Walk Indoors?
The Flux Capacitor It Ain't
The Crippling Effect of Drugs?
Stealers Win
Play Time
Pebble Beach, Anyone?